Quote:
Originally Posted by brecklundin
Your analogy is completely incorrect, Amazon is NOT a legal authority and has no right to seize any one's property no matter what the situation, even if they are acting in good faith. It is up to the courts to rule the property as stolen. The police have the job to enforce the laws and function as directed to by LEGAL RULINGS not at the behest of a corporation or private party. Even if the police decide on their own the bike is stolen, it will not be returned to the person claiming loss, it will go into the evidence locker until such time as it is either proven to have been stolen, and if not, then returned to the person(s) from whom it was seized.
|
I actually never implied that Amazon was a legal authority, all I implied was the difference taken between the Police and Amazon in the process of repossession. Amazon took without any warning, the Police at least notify you at the time that property is being repossessed. Absolutely nothing in my initial post indicated any hint of legal authority, it was merely stating the perceived processes taken from a consumer perspective in removing said items of question from the consumer.