View Single Post
Old 10-05-2009, 04:58 PM   #22
dmikov
Addict
dmikov has learned how to read e-booksdmikov has learned how to read e-booksdmikov has learned how to read e-booksdmikov has learned how to read e-booksdmikov has learned how to read e-booksdmikov has learned how to read e-booksdmikov has learned how to read e-booksdmikov has learned how to read e-books
 
dmikov's Avatar
 
Posts: 257
Karma: 960
Join Date: Dec 2006
Device: REB1200; REB2150; Sony 500/350; EZReader; IREX DR800SG; Nook/Color
Quote:
Originally Posted by N0NJY View Post
The scientific community (generally on the left) has attempted to ban, or reduce the impact of, for instance the Bible.

While the religious community (generally on the right) has attempted to minimize the impact of Darwin's theories.

There is no "meeting of the minds" in the middle on that subject and honestly, will likely never be. The fact is human beings are biased and will remain so - and truthfully, each of are biased and will resist outside change until we die.
Oh come on, we are talking text book and education, it has no more place for unsubstantiated beliefs of any form (religion included along with any other crackpot cosmology (Deniken, Blavatskaya, big JuJu), then Darwin theory in the Temple or Church. Did scientific community really tried to ban religion anywhere outside the area of hard science?
Let's have science in the classroom and religion in Church or Sunday classes if you so inclined.

Last edited by dmikov; 10-05-2009 at 05:01 PM.
dmikov is offline   Reply With Quote