Thread: want to go from 500 to 300
View Single Post
Old 10-03-2009, 10:37 PM   #14
EatingPie
Blueberry!
EatingPie puts his or her pants on both legs at a time.EatingPie puts his or her pants on both legs at a time.EatingPie puts his or her pants on both legs at a time.EatingPie puts his or her pants on both legs at a time.EatingPie puts his or her pants on both legs at a time.EatingPie puts his or her pants on both legs at a time.EatingPie puts his or her pants on both legs at a time.EatingPie puts his or her pants on both legs at a time.EatingPie puts his or her pants on both legs at a time.EatingPie puts his or her pants on both legs at a time.EatingPie puts his or her pants on both legs at a time.
 
EatingPie's Avatar
 
Posts: 888
Karma: 133343
Join Date: Mar 2007
Device: Sony PRS-500 (RIP); PRS-600 (Good Riddance); PRS-505; PRS-650; PRS-350
Quote:
Originally Posted by Crowl View Post
Most reviews seem to have got it as being slightly slower than a 505, which is a shame as the combination of increased portability and the extra internal memory to offset the loss of a card slot would have made the 300 a potential upgrade for 505 users if it was also a speed upgrade.
Thanks for the replies.

I was just looking for clarification on this comment (and got it, it seems):

Quote:
Some say the 300 is a fractions of a second slower then the 500 but I have not noticed this.
Given the two replies, looks like that was a typo and should have read "505."

Has anyone tried the NIV Bible on the 300? That's the REAL test. It's such a dog on my 500 (not a typo ) that it's almost unusable. It's just too big for the poor guy, so loading, TOC selecting, etc. all take in the 10 second range. Once you get where you're going, it's okay. But forget cross referencing!

-Pie
EatingPie is offline   Reply With Quote