Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike M.
I have to agree with the author to an extent. While the function of the ebook device cannot be matched, the experience is not the same as a book. The ability to carry your entire library with you makes sense, but does not "feel" the same as carrying even one of your favorite books. Looking at shelves lined with books does indeed create a different feeling than a digital reader on the desk, even if it does contain thousands of ebooks.
What is not mentioned is that going digital (with all of its benefits) does not stop anyone from remaining a fan of the physical book. Why not keep one foot in each world? The quality of books on the shelf would most likely increase. It would be nice if publishers would allow us to download the digitial version of a book when we purchase the physical one.
Another route toward a solution is an ebook device that "felt" more like a book. Maybe a two-page device that opens like a book and could be covered with something nice like leather (or whatever). Maybe we could at least get closer to the experience that is missed by the flat device.
For those who desire function over experience, I think ebook devices are doing pretty good.
|
I agree with you. I read as many physical books as digital. More probably. Frankly I wouldn't want to give that up. The kindle has been a neat experience and I love getting back into reading classics and out of print mysteries but I love going to my library and bookstore to get books as well. And the devices do need to give you a more book like feel. It is why I always have a cover on the kindle when reading. Makes it feel less gadgety.