View Single Post
Old 10-02-2009, 12:48 PM   #74
bill_mchale
Wizard
bill_mchale ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.bill_mchale ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.bill_mchale ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.bill_mchale ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.bill_mchale ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.bill_mchale ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.bill_mchale ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.bill_mchale ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.bill_mchale ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.bill_mchale ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.bill_mchale ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 1,451
Karma: 1550000
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Maryland, USA
Device: Nook Simple Touch, HPC Evo 4G LTE
Quote:
Originally Posted by Format C: View Post
A forced monopoly marked can hardly be called "free", IMHO.
Apart from that, in the digital future, unless we'll all have a cop in every computer/device [and I think Americans won't like this kind of Stalinism], the "per-copy" reward model will be abandoned.

Ok, a couple of points here....

1. It is not a forced monopoly. Ideally it is a limited term monopoly that is granted by the state over a work to allow the creator of that work a chance to profit from it. Since the very notion of copyright is written into the United States Constitution, it is hardly a forced monopoly but one granted by the social contract that all American citizens are a part of.

2. There is no need to have a monitor in every computer. Any decent web server software already keeps a log of all attempts to access it and through what computer it was accessed. It would be relatively easy to monitor for downloads and report the number of unique downloads (not necessarily whose doing the downloading) to determine how the creators of works are to be paid.

--
Bill
bill_mchale is offline   Reply With Quote