Quote:
Originally Posted by corroonb
I think you mean the proletariat (or working-classes), most of the bourgeoisie (middle-classes) would have been able to read in the Victorian era, I presume.
It also depends on what you mean by 'literate'.
1
a : educated, cultured
b : able to read and write
There is a difference.
|
I meant able to read and write. The same people who would have been proletariat back then are now bourgeoesie (at least in the US). Today there is an entire class of uncultured and half-educated people with the ability to read and access to books. Crappy best-sellers are the price we pay. But, it's better than having large numbers of uncultured and illiterate people.
In Europe in the 1840s, 66% of men could read and 50% of women. I'm sure the numbers were worse in the US. Literacy rates today are close to 100% for developed countries. I think this shift is the reason for the change in literary taste. One can now be uncultured, uneducated and literate. Back then the three were intertwined. Just my opinion.