View Single Post
Old 02-25-2007, 01:29 PM   #19
NatCh
Gizmologist
NatCh ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.NatCh ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.NatCh ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.NatCh ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.NatCh ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.NatCh ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.NatCh ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.NatCh ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.NatCh ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.NatCh ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.NatCh ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
NatCh's Avatar
 
Posts: 11,615
Karma: 929550
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Republic of Texas Embassy at Jackson, TN
Device: Pocketbook Touch HD3
Well, more specifically, DougFNJ (and more nit-pickingly ), the vendor is only required by law to collect the sales taxes for the state he operates in. The state is what charges the tax.

In your example, NJ requires Mom&Pop.com to collect the sales taxes it charges you (as one of its residents), but TX has no authority to require that Mom&Pop.com collect the sales taxes it charges me (as one of its residents).

In that scenario, TX does have authority to directly charge the sales taxes on me, but lacks the seller as an agent for collecting them from me. In fact, TX does still consider itself owed those taxes, and if they ever figure out a way to document and track them, I expect they'll send me a bill and probably a nasty note.
NatCh is offline   Reply With Quote