View Single Post
Old 02-22-2007, 06:44 AM   #32
Bob Russell
Recovering Gadget Addict
Bob Russell ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Bob Russell ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Bob Russell ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Bob Russell ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Bob Russell ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Bob Russell ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Bob Russell ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Bob Russell ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Bob Russell ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Bob Russell ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Bob Russell ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Bob Russell's Avatar
 
Posts: 5,381
Karma: 676161
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Device: iPad
Quote:
Originally Posted by RWood
Bob, I'll take "Making an eBook from a Binder of 8.5" x 11" for $100"
(Be sure to phrase your response ....)

Cheapo-cheapo production methods would be to use the scanning part of the multifunction printer such as the HP 6210 All in One that I picked up at CompUSA for just under $100 that includes bundled software for both the Mac and PC. Among that software is a fairly good OCR program.

The scanner part has an automatic feed (no duplex) that can be set to as small as a mass market ("it fits in your hip pocket") paperback. I have scanned, rearranged pages, and OCR on the software with very good results. Sure some ls were 1s; but, nobody's perfect all of the time.
That's very interesting...I've been perusing those all-in-ones for such a purpose myself. I notice you can even get duplex scanning for about $400. But if you have auto sheet feeders without duplex scanning, isn't it tough to get the book pages in the right order? And don't you get a lot of misfeeds with inexpensive all-in-ones?

I'm hoping that those are not issues -- a decent $100 book scanning solution would be very impressive. Tell us more!
Bob Russell is offline   Reply With Quote