View Single Post
Old 09-11-2009, 04:19 PM   #32
brecklundin
Banned
brecklundin is as sexy as a twisted cruller doughtnut.brecklundin is as sexy as a twisted cruller doughtnut.brecklundin is as sexy as a twisted cruller doughtnut.brecklundin is as sexy as a twisted cruller doughtnut.brecklundin is as sexy as a twisted cruller doughtnut.brecklundin is as sexy as a twisted cruller doughtnut.brecklundin is as sexy as a twisted cruller doughtnut.brecklundin is as sexy as a twisted cruller doughtnut.brecklundin is as sexy as a twisted cruller doughtnut.brecklundin is as sexy as a twisted cruller doughtnut.brecklundin is as sexy as a twisted cruller doughtnut.
 
Posts: 1,906
Karma: 15348
Join Date: Jun 2007
Device: mine
Quote:
Originally Posted by Treven View Post
Definately I agree that if I wanted something bigger, I'd carry my 17" laptop around with me all the time, like I do with my 700.

Remember bigger isn't always better; that goes for in bed or for a Kindle.
And do not make the mistake of assuming everyone wants a reader only for reading text/novels. And I DO carry a 17" laptop, including secondary battery, with me everywhere I wander.

My question in my previous comment still stands...why, as implied by fugazied's comment, would a 17" READING device make a reader so "oppressively" heavy? The technology behind the display is the same as a 5"-10" reader as they exists today. So the same sized battery will deliver similar battery life. And even if the battery size is doubled it will add only a few ounces at the most.
brecklundin is offline   Reply With Quote