Quote:
Originally Posted by doreenjoy
In a blistering assessment of the deal, Peters told lawmakers that the settlement is in essence a compulsory license that would give Google the ability to engage in activities, such as text display and sale of downloads, that are “indisputable acts of copyright infringement.”
|
That quote makes Peters sound like a bureaucrat defending it's turf since the quote seems to put an inflammatory twist on the facts in favor of the bureaucracy. I wonder if the judge will see through that or not?