View Single Post
Old 09-09-2009, 10:47 AM   #61
wgrimm
Addict
wgrimm ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.wgrimm ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.wgrimm ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.wgrimm ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.wgrimm ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.wgrimm ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.wgrimm ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.wgrimm ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.wgrimm ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.wgrimm ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.wgrimm ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 230
Karma: 334908
Join Date: Oct 2006
Device: multiple
Quote:
Originally Posted by doreenjoy View Post
You're missing my point. Everyone has a different opinion about what constitutes "trash", which is why judgements about "good" and "bad" books will always be subjective.

For proof, do a search on Dan Brown. He certainly has devoted fans, and those who think he is not worthy of publication.
This is the same fallacious thinking that results in the abyss known as "cultural relativity" in ethical standards. If everyone is a critic, well, there are effectively NO critics- no work of art can be judged by a rational standard.

I think it is possible to have rational standards of criticism in the arts; as for Dan Brown, sorry, he's just a "bad" writer. Most bestsellers are poor works of literature.....
wgrimm is offline   Reply With Quote