Quote:
Originally Posted by forcheville
It's like stepping in dogshit.
|
Saying such a thing in a thread started, and regularly read, by someone
who likes Dan Brown, is discourteous, to say the least. In fact, to use
your analogy, it's like taking a dump on their lawn as they are mowing it.
All of you people ranting in this thread about Brown should really try to
understand the, not overly complicated, subject that the OP has given it.
Not once has he asked for your opinion on Dan Brown himself, yet he has
been force-fed insulting rants for 12 pages of posts. Some have actually
returned 3 - 4 times to excrete their jealousy of Brown's success in vile
diatribes which are more insulting to the OP, than they could ever be to Dan
Brown. It's one thing to express your opinion (even though it wasn't asked
for), but doing it in a way which insults everyone who disagrees with you is
simply despicable. Especially if you also think you're being clever in your
critique, when really, you're just being an elitist banker (or something which
rhymes with "banker", nudge nudge).
Luckily, some people understand the question the OP posed and provided
some great recommendations.
To the OP: I admire the restraint, with which you have behaved in this
thread. You are a better person than the bankers (or something which
rhymes with "bankers", nudge nudge). I salute you, Sir.
PS. I wholeheartedly second the Stieg Larsson recommendations.