Thread: Seriousness American Health Care
View Single Post
Old 09-04-2009, 10:03 AM   #166
WDecraene
Zealot
WDecraene will become famous soon enoughWDecraene will become famous soon enoughWDecraene will become famous soon enoughWDecraene will become famous soon enoughWDecraene will become famous soon enoughWDecraene will become famous soon enough
 
WDecraene's Avatar
 
Posts: 114
Karma: 597
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Belgistan
Device: A FREE (!!!) replacement cybook gen 3
Quote:
Originally Posted by Halk View Post
Personally I'm in favour of IVF being provided by the state. The reason is not simply because of compassion. It's because we will have a lopsided population eventually, and generally speaking people who would go on IVF are stable couples, the type of people I'd like to see raising kids rather than Vicky Pollard.
I'm all for free health care, but fertility treatments ? No, there I would draw the line ...

There's always adoption. (should be) Less expensive, and there's too many children dying elsewhere.

The reasoning that it should be covered because it is very important for the people involved could be made to work for people who want esthetical surgery too...
WDecraene is offline   Reply With Quote