View Single Post
Old 09-04-2009, 12:57 AM   #12
kovidgoyal
creator of calibre
kovidgoyal ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.kovidgoyal ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.kovidgoyal ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.kovidgoyal ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.kovidgoyal ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.kovidgoyal ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.kovidgoyal ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.kovidgoyal ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.kovidgoyal ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.kovidgoyal ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.kovidgoyal ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
kovidgoyal's Avatar
 
Posts: 45,417
Karma: 27757236
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Mumbai, India
Device: Various
It's nowhere near that simple. The number of layers that Microsoft has added in an effort to make future code more robust while maintaining backward compatibility is no joke. For example: Have a file with an ending of .local with the same name as the exe will cause the dynamic linker to look in the same directory as the executable first. Then there's the whole rigamarole with SxS. Then there are at least a couple of environment variables, one of which is PATH that influence the algorithm used by the dynamic linker. It's a completely byzantine mess...
kovidgoyal is online now   Reply With Quote