Quote:
Originally Posted by ahammer
let see. cop- state run. fire-state run. garbage-state run(my area does not do this. I pay for my garbage to be pick up right from the people that pick it up. most of my state does this or pays a hoa to do this.)
You will grow all your own food because you don't want subsidised food.
been trying to get the govrment out of this system for years now.
yes I want the goverment out of all of our aspects of our lives as we can. the overall cost goes down that way.
the fedral goverment is already in tomany things they should not be lets not add somthing on top of it.
also ask yourself if this is needed so badly "NOW" then why is the build being held off till after the next prez race.
|
As I stated, and Shunt1 agreed, his concerns are not about whether or not the
federal government should be providing public health care. His concerns are about there being any cost to him in providing health care to others via any form of government spending.
I find it very hard to believe that many here who are arguing against a public health care system would suddenly have no problem with such if it were provided by the state governments instead of the federal government.
It may sound better to be saying that you oppose a
federally run public health care system but what is really the issue, as evidenced by the comments of most of those arguing against public health care, is that those opposing it simply don't want any of their money spent on it.
Cheers,
PKFFW