|
Allow me to explain my previous post. I was not asking for a fair comparison. My main point of view is: comparison page-turn speed is meaningless. Pursuing the fastest page-turn device is not a good decision criteria. For example, if a device capable of displaying complicate layout is slower 1 sec than another device only capable of displaying txt file, does that mean the later device match user's needs? It depends. I guess many (or some) users will choose the first device because it can display compilcate layout on screen, and the slowness is in acceptable range.
Of course, page-turn speed is just a parameter, not all. And it's not an important parameter since every device seems to be doing the refresh job in a acceptable, if not satisfied speed.
|