View Single Post
Old 09-02-2009, 11:57 AM   #489
ahi
Wizard
ahi ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ahi ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ahi ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ahi ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ahi ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ahi ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ahi ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ahi ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ahi ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ahi ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ahi ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 1,790
Karma: 507333
Join Date: May 2009
Device: none
Quote:
Originally Posted by WillAdams View Post
Dawnfalcon said:
>A LaTeX install is also, at a minimum, hundreds of meg in size.
>This is one of the things I'm on about - it's not suitable as a
>typological processor in a low-resource environment. Typography
>is demnstrably mostly-solveable, by brute force, but that that
>soloution is not applicable to low-power devices.

Actually, a LaTeX install can easily be done in 10s of megabytes:

http://www.uoregon.edu/~koch/

For PCs there's an even more granular install set:

http://w32tex.org/

I've seen TeX installations done for pen top computers and a colleague is working on an implementation for the Apple iPhone / iPod Touch.

Moreover, an ebook reader wouldn't need a general LaTeX installation, but rather a specific one w/ a specific subset of fonts and the desired documentclass, so could easily be stripped down to the bare essentials which would be quite small --- remember TeX dates back to a time when a 25MHz 68040 w/ a 105MB HD was a professional workstation --- these days most cell phones have more processing power.

William
Hmmm... I suppose LaTeX files that include all their various .sty and whatever else dependencies would be a step up.

But even there, I personally have reservations as to why such an approach would be taken instead of multiple layouts for popular font/display size combinations, and HTML reflow for the rest. (After all, even LaTeX can't produce typographically decent documents for unrealistic font/display size combinations. If your screen is a few words wide, and less than ten lines in height... may as well leave it as unjustified free-flowing text at that point.)

- Ahi
ahi is offline   Reply With Quote