Quote:
|
Originally Posted by TheMooch
True, there's no DRM now, but then they're not using the electronic version as a primary form of revenue generation. If the electronic form becomes their main means of distrbution then they're going to want to protect it and force people to subscribe.
They gotta make money somehow.
|
I thought that the Times let you see today's articles for free, but charged for access to the past articles. (It's been a while since I've gone to the Times online.)
But even in that case, they aren't putting DRM on the past articles. They are simply charging for the service to search and display past articles.