Thread: NY Times owner - Print version irrelevant or gone in 5 years
View Single Post
Old 02-09-2007, 12:14 AM   #5
RWood
Technogeezer
RWood ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.RWood ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.RWood ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.RWood ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.RWood ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.RWood ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.RWood ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.RWood ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.RWood ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.RWood ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.RWood ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
RWood's Avatar
 
Posts: 7,233
Karma: 1601464
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Virginia, USA
Device: Sony PRS-500
The Wall Street Journal (WSJ) has always been a pay to view articles site. They give away a few headlines for free but that is all.

Also, the NYC papers have a higher than national average of street sales and its kinda hard to hold on to a subway strap with one hand and use a reader with the other.
RWood is offline   Reply With Quote