View Single Post
Old 08-24-2009, 07:24 PM   #35
macr0t0r
Connoisseur
macr0t0r doesn't littermacr0t0r doesn't litter
 
macr0t0r's Avatar
 
Posts: 91
Karma: 108
Join Date: Jan 2008
Device: Palm Treo 680, Sony Reader
Quote:
Originally Posted by JSWolf View Post
B&N can go kiss my ass. They are taking eBooks and making a mess out of them. We don't need or want yet another DRM added to ePub. We don't want any DRM. But if we have to have DRM, we want just one DRM.
Oh, HECK no! I want every company to have their own DRM for their own device (like Sony and Amazon). I want them to charge authors and publishers the PRIVILEGE of using their DRM and locked-down store as well!

I want this DRM to be every bit the fiasco that online music was. With luck, we'll get the same result: everybody gets angry and frustrated to the point that DRM gets dropped.


However, if that is a crazy dream, then I'll agree that they should've stuck with the Adobe Adept DRM instead. If their intent is to make sure that their E-ink device is the only one that can read their ebooks, then they are seriously shooting themselves in the foot. They should leverage the many devices that are already out in the wild and searching for content.

- Jim

Last edited by macr0t0r; 08-24-2009 at 07:26 PM. Reason: spelling
macr0t0r is offline   Reply With Quote