View Single Post
Old 08-22-2009, 09:17 PM   #114
emellaich
Wizard
emellaich ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.emellaich ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.emellaich ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.emellaich ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.emellaich ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.emellaich ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.emellaich ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.emellaich ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.emellaich ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.emellaich ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.emellaich ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 1,101
Karma: 4388403
Join Date: Oct 2007
Device: Palm>Ebookman>IPaq>Axim>Cybook>Kndl2>IPAD>Kndl3SO>Voyager>Oasis
Quote:
Originally Posted by Baldrake View Post
So a lot of people are complaining that the Sony 700/600 have unacceptable degradation in crispness of the screen compared to the non-touch versions (505/300). Is this also a problem with the Opus, or does it compare well to non-touch readers?
I know you already have one answer on this (that the Opus is not touch-screen). However, I'd also point out another item for clarification.

I haven't seen this myself, but the word is that touch-screen isn't the problem with the screen degradation. The 700 has both a touch screen and a special layer used to provide a light for reading. This is a front light similar to a light wedge, and it is required because e-ink doesn't support a backlight. The word is that there is a small gap between this front light and the device, and that it is this gap that creates the degradation problem.

As a result, most folks seem to believe that the upcoming touchscreen Sony 600 will be fine since it doesn't have a front light -- just a touch screen.
emellaich is offline   Reply With Quote