View Single Post
Old 08-17-2009, 03:48 PM   #18
doreenjoy
01000100 01001010
doreenjoy ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.doreenjoy ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.doreenjoy ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.doreenjoy ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.doreenjoy ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.doreenjoy ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.doreenjoy ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.doreenjoy ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.doreenjoy ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.doreenjoy ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.doreenjoy ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
doreenjoy's Avatar
 
Posts: 1,889
Karma: 2400000
Join Date: Mar 2009
Device: Polyamorous
I think the author has a right not to see his work used by others to make money. He invented the characters and the world. So long as his work is under copyright, he has the right to keep it inviolate. Comparisons to Hamlet (whose author was long dead) are off the mark, IMO, because Salinger is a living author.

There is a wide variety of opinions about derivative works among authors & artists.

Personally I think it's sad that J.D. Salinger is so protective of his works, but understandable. The author himself certainly has the right to his opinions regarding his own work.
doreenjoy is offline   Reply With Quote