View Single Post
Old 08-14-2009, 07:20 PM   #16
corroonb
Addict
corroonb ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.corroonb ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.corroonb ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.corroonb ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.corroonb ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.corroonb ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.corroonb ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.corroonb ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.corroonb ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.corroonb ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.corroonb ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
corroonb's Avatar
 
Posts: 317
Karma: 1232685
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Ireland
Device: Kindle Voyage, Kobo Aura, Nexus 9
Quote:
Originally Posted by Abecedary View Post
Is there a specific style guide and/or dictionary that you (or the original editor) are following? If yes, then go by those rules. If you are dealing with an older book/document and want to keep the original styling (as you say in your original post), then try to find the oldest copy of the work that you can. Check with your local library system or some local colleges/universities to see what they have available. But otherwise, as was already mentioned, sometimes editors of newer editions will choose to update some of the style decisions to be in line with more modern usage.
I have no style guide.

I think Patricia is correct and that an automatic conversion has removed a lot of dashes in compound words, although not em dashes thankfully.

This is why I like having a PB copy of the book I am proofing.
corroonb is offline   Reply With Quote