View Single Post
Old 08-14-2009, 05:33 PM   #29
Laz116
Guru
Laz116 is a glorious beacon of lightLaz116 is a glorious beacon of lightLaz116 is a glorious beacon of lightLaz116 is a glorious beacon of lightLaz116 is a glorious beacon of lightLaz116 is a glorious beacon of lightLaz116 is a glorious beacon of lightLaz116 is a glorious beacon of lightLaz116 is a glorious beacon of lightLaz116 is a glorious beacon of lightLaz116 is a glorious beacon of light
 
Laz116's Avatar
 
Posts: 640
Karma: 12129
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Denmark
Device: Sony PRS-700
Quote:
Originally Posted by kazbates View Post
So, the wealthy in your country have access to better and more immediate healthcare than the general populace. That's one of the arguments of proponents Universal healthcare, so that the poor can have the same healthcare as the wealthy or well-off. That scenario just isn't going to happen. Those who can afford better healthcare will always get it.
Yes. It'll probably always be like that. As I understand it, the debate in the US is more about raising the standards of health care for those who can't afford anything better. Am I wrong?
Laz116 is offline   Reply With Quote