View Single Post
Old 08-14-2009, 05:18 PM   #72
imabuddha
Electron Choreographer
imabuddha exercises by bench pressing the entire Harry Potter series in hardcoverimabuddha exercises by bench pressing the entire Harry Potter series in hardcoverimabuddha exercises by bench pressing the entire Harry Potter series in hardcoverimabuddha exercises by bench pressing the entire Harry Potter series in hardcoverimabuddha exercises by bench pressing the entire Harry Potter series in hardcoverimabuddha exercises by bench pressing the entire Harry Potter series in hardcoverimabuddha exercises by bench pressing the entire Harry Potter series in hardcoverimabuddha exercises by bench pressing the entire Harry Potter series in hardcoverimabuddha exercises by bench pressing the entire Harry Potter series in hardcoverimabuddha exercises by bench pressing the entire Harry Potter series in hardcoverimabuddha exercises by bench pressing the entire Harry Potter series in hardcover
 
imabuddha's Avatar
 
Posts: 32
Karma: 16402
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Miyazaki, Japan
Device: Kindle Oasis 2, PW2, Kobo Glo, Nook SimpleTouch, iPad, iPhone…
Thumbs down {sigh}

Quote:
Originally Posted by kazbates View Post
The publisher has the book's "blueprint" just as the manufacturer has the chair's "blueprint". The furniture maker can make a duplicate copy of the chair, just as the publisher can make a duplicate copy of the book.
But that's not the comparison made in your prior post. Merely possessing a blueprint doesn't automatically grant the right to produce the object(s) described therein.

As noted by many people in similar discussions on the 'net, the cost of duplicating digital bits approaches $0, while such isn't the case for tangible goods such as a chair. Please note I'm not saying unauthorized duplication is morally OK or justifiable.
imabuddha is offline   Reply With Quote