View Single Post
Old 08-14-2009, 12:09 PM   #3
corroonb
Addict
corroonb ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.corroonb ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.corroonb ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.corroonb ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.corroonb ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.corroonb ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.corroonb ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.corroonb ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.corroonb ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.corroonb ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.corroonb ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
corroonb's Avatar
 
Posts: 317
Karma: 1232685
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Ireland
Device: Kindle Voyage, Kobo Aura, Nexus 9
Quote:
Originally Posted by HarryT View Post
Certainly when it comes to the "classics", many editors will choose to use "modern" punctuation rather than that which was prevelent at the time the book was written.

Eg, until the early 20th century, "today", and "tomorrow" were normally written "to-day" and "to-morrow". Some editors of, say, Dickens, will keep the original spelling (with the hyphens), others will remove the hyphens to conform to modern usage.

Is that what you were asking?
Yes, somewhat, thanks.

So this kind of thing is acceptable in certain cases?

The case you mention is rather more clear cut than what I was thinking of. In a book I'm proofing I've come across a double hyphenated word and because it appears to be in the original text, I chose to leave it as it was even though I thought it was stylistically horrible. The book isn't even that old either.

Last edited by corroonb; 08-14-2009 at 12:13 PM.
corroonb is offline   Reply With Quote