View Single Post
Old 08-13-2009, 06:16 AM   #76
Sweetpea
Grand Sorcerer
Sweetpea ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Sweetpea ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Sweetpea ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Sweetpea ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Sweetpea ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Sweetpea ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Sweetpea ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Sweetpea ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Sweetpea ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Sweetpea ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Sweetpea ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Sweetpea's Avatar
 
Posts: 9,707
Karma: 32763414
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Krewerd
Device: Pocketbook Inkpad 4 Color; Samsung Galaxy Tab S6
Quote:
Originally Posted by krischik View Post
Wrong - in Germany the act of removing a copy protection is considered a crime.
How will they know you removed the DRM from a book, if you're the only one that sees that book?

Quote:
Originally Posted by gerraldo View Post
OK, agreed... But what if Sonys next move is to only support DRMed ePubs and Adobes to only licence their ePub-DRM if you just support DRMed ePubs?! Now that would be a smart move...
That's a whole different situation. And I doubt it would happen... There are too many non-DRM books out there.

Quote:
Originally Posted by K-Thom View Post
It is considered a crime, but there won't be any prosecution if you remove copy protection merely for private use. Though the copyright holder still may file for a civil action law suit.

So, if you remove DRM, just don't go out and brag about it. Simple as it is ...
Yep, except that I will admit I remove DRM for personal purposes. And it is officially a crime here too. And they will never go against the people that remove DRM for personal purposes. It would hurt them much more than they would gain.
Sweetpea is offline   Reply With Quote