View Single Post
Old 08-05-2009, 03:41 PM   #167
rixte
Addict
rixte ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.rixte ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.rixte ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.rixte ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.rixte ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.rixte ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.rixte ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.rixte ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.rixte ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.rixte ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.rixte ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
rixte's Avatar
 
Posts: 300
Karma: 396757
Join Date: Nov 2007
Device: new oasis, paperwhite, ipad, kobo
Quote:
Originally Posted by griffonwing View Post
I feel that Sony's option to unload every non-essential embellishment from a reader, and have a solid CORE product is a good thing. Sony has had years of experience with their PRS line, and the units seems quite solid in both hardware and software. So I would have no qualms against purchasing a Sony Reader product.

The PRS-300 has no SD card (lower cost), unimpressive controller (lower cost), simple sleeve (much lower cost), no TTS, no folder support, no user-changeable battery. Just a product that does one thing, and one thing only, read a few book formats, and an ability to store a few hundred on an internal flash memory.

However, where I see absolutely nothing at all wrong with their decision to take this route, I heartily am appalled at the price they give this gimped unit.

It's only 20 bucks cheaper than Astak's unit, which, when compared, is a 20 bucks anyone would gladly spend for the multitude of improvements.

The PRS-300, in my humble opinion, should be introduced at $129.00, if not $99. The unit, in it's gimped state, is not worth the high price that they are suggesting.

I would not pay more than 129.00 for such a device. The device itself, taken for it's own merits, might be a 200 dollar device. But you have to take into consideration the competition, and price accordingly.

With a price point of 199, you have to wonder how much of that is going to be pure profit, taking into account how much stuff is missing.
Considering RobertB's said one of the reasons they couldn't go lower is the panel price of screens for 5 inches went up, I wouldn't expect Sony to be able to take such a dramatic loss.
rixte is offline   Reply With Quote