View Single Post
Old 08-04-2009, 01:40 PM   #4
wallcraft
reader
wallcraft ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.wallcraft ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.wallcraft ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.wallcraft ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.wallcraft ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.wallcraft ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.wallcraft ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.wallcraft ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.wallcraft ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.wallcraft ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.wallcraft ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
wallcraft's Avatar
 
Posts: 6,977
Karma: 5183568
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Mississippi, USA
Device: Kindle 3, Kobo Glo HD
The current Sony Desktop Reader emulates a PRS-700. The only difference this makes in the emulator is the number of font sizes (zoom levels) which is 3 for the PRS-505 and 5 for the PRS-700. So what you see in the Desktop Reader is the same as you will see on the PRS-505. All you need to do is copy the PDFs over via USB (either in Desktop Reader or Calibre, or manually by treating the PRS-505 as a disk drive).

Note that some PDFs don't display (reflow) as well as your test PDFs do.

Sony is about to come out with two new readers, the PRS-300 and PRS-600. The former is like the PRS-505 except with a 5" screen (vs 6") and no memory expansion for ~$200. The latter is like the PRS-700, with a 6" touch screen. The PRS-700 is in general better than the PRS-505 for PDFs because it has a zoom mode as well as a reflow mode. The PRS-600 at ~$300 looks to be a very good choice for those who want to read PDFs on a small screen. We don't have full details of the PRS-600 (due this month), so there might be a "gotcha" we don't know about, but my recommendation would be to wait for the PRS-600 to see if it fits your needs. See Wiki: PRS600 for what we know so far,
wallcraft is offline   Reply With Quote