Quote:
Originally Posted by Shaggy
She had just as much reason to believe it as Amazon did, assuming that we are saying Amazon should not be held responsible.
|
I disagree. While I do think Amazon should check a little more thoroughly on it's submissions, they did have someone giving them identifying information and explicitly claiming that they had the rights to distribute. I really doubt Ms. Thomas had any sort of authorization process at all when she got tracks. Sure, she could've just assumed since someone gave them to her that it was legal to give them to someone else. I could assume if an item in a store doesn't have a price tag on it that it's free but I doubt I'd get away with that argument when I tried to walk out the door with it. My assumption wouldn't hold up in court. They would expect me to have some basic knowledge of the rules.