View Single Post
Old 07-20-2009, 05:37 PM   #149
Shaggy
Wizard
Shaggy ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Shaggy ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Shaggy ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Shaggy ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Shaggy ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Shaggy ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Shaggy ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Shaggy ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Shaggy ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Shaggy ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Shaggy ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Shaggy's Avatar
 
Posts: 4,293
Karma: 529619
Join Date: May 2007
Device: iRex iLiad, DR800SG
Quote:
Originally Posted by ahi View Post
I think it should be illegal--by national/federal law--for a device maker to construct their device in a way to facilitate the monitoring or deleting of content without explicit consent by the user on a case by case basis.
Are we positive it's not? I can see them getting away with monitoring via a term in the contract (authorized access), Microsoft basically does the same thing with their automatic updates and WGA, but not deleting. I would expect that if Microsoft went in and started deleting user owned content, they would get nailed for it.
Shaggy is offline   Reply With Quote