|
Sparrow. Except for amazon didn't forcibly enter Their homes and "steal" the files back. Their was no trespassing involved. The media itself assumes that manafacturers can intrude into lives and make changes on your device. Firmware updates that might change a feature you love and disable other features you dislike for example. So let's say you see your property in a thiefs house and you can retrieve your property by calling it to you like you would a dog. And in the process of calling it to you, you reimburse the present possesor full price so there was no actual loss on his part, and you then offer to sell him another product (a legal one this time) with the money you returned to him. I don't see how the poor sap that bought the stolen property can be considered to have been "wronged." I noticed by the way that there's another thread that goes round and round about this and it doesn't appear that any consensus can be reached about this. it's probably fruitless discussion kind of like two people arguing religion rarely if ever manage to change the other persons mind.
|