|
There is no difference (or should be no difference) between entering a Kindle device to remove content and entering your house to remove your furniture. In the pre-wired world, if a seller unknowingly stocked and sold illegal material, he could be liable if he did not remove it forthwith from his inventory and make a good faith effort to notify as many purchasers as possible that they were in possession of illegal material that must be returned. However no seller of a tangible product has ever had the right to enter your premises without your permission and remove anything.
The electronic model is creating a "brave new world" and if citizens are not VERY vigilant, we could be the big losers.
The idea of licensing rather than selling electronic-medium software and books is a pernicious model that creates an environment in which our privacy and right to own property outright is at risk. Except to preserve human life or to execute a lawful warrant, no one can enter my home without my prior permission. Modern electronic extensions of the bounders of my "home" should be subject to the same restrictions.
I can of course make a contract with someone in which I give him or her the right to enter my premises. Such a contract is a negotiated contract. End User License Agreements (EULAS) are adhesion contracts and I have NO reasonable way of reaching an agreement with the seller to add, remove or modify any of its stipulations. Furthermore, the manner in which such contracts are made and the style in which they are written make it impossible for many people to even know what they are deemed to have agreed to.
|