Quote:
Originally Posted by HarryT
A jury of her peers decided that, on the balance of probabilities, she did commit willful copyright infringement. That's really all that matters, isn't it?
|
Should a jury be deciding that, when there was absolutely no evidence presented that she did?
It really looks to me like the jury found in favor of the plaintiff because the defendant was an idiot and pissed them off, not because the plaintiff proved their case.