Quote:
Originally Posted by HarryT
She was not "sharing" two dozen songs but 1,702. The 24 used in the court case were merely a representative sample.
|
No, she was allegedly sharing 1,702 songs. Only 24 were used in court, so the other 1678 did not exist. There was no evidence or chance to defend against any charges for the other 1678. You (not surprisingly) seem to be assuming guilt on songs that were never even part of the trial.
Quote:
|
She really was amazingly stupid - eg, claiming that someone might have hijacked her WiFi network when, in fact, she didn't actually have WiFi, and making a clumsy attempt to hide the evidence by changing the hard disk in her PC before submitting it for examination.
|
There's no doubt that she was an idiot and probably committed perjury. However, that does not make her guilty.