View Single Post
Old 07-11-2009, 06:08 AM   #181
zerospinboson
"Assume a can opener..."
zerospinboson ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.zerospinboson ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.zerospinboson ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.zerospinboson ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.zerospinboson ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.zerospinboson ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.zerospinboson ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.zerospinboson ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.zerospinboson ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.zerospinboson ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.zerospinboson ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
zerospinboson's Avatar
 
Posts: 755
Karma: 1942109
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Local Cluster
Device: iLiad v2, DR1000
Quote:
Originally Posted by Harmon View Post
So you must believe that the jury instructions were wrong.

(BTW, I've read something recently that suggests that my supposition that the statutory damages will almost certainly be reduced by the court of appeals may also be wrong. This woman could be dead in the water.)
How is that relevant? Yes, the instructions were wrong, but that's because putting someone through a lawsuit that potentially costs the defendant thousands of dollars just to ensure they won't "share" 2 dozen songs is wrong, something which was in turn made possible because certain idiotic/outdated/Procrustean laws existing. Jury instructions are just an effect (a legally circumscribed one, at that, so nothing went wrong technically)
zerospinboson is offline   Reply With Quote