View Single Post
Old 07-10-2009, 10:41 AM   #196
Shaggy
Wizard
Shaggy ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Shaggy ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Shaggy ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Shaggy ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Shaggy ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Shaggy ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Shaggy ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Shaggy ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Shaggy ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Shaggy ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Shaggy ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Shaggy's Avatar
 
Posts: 4,293
Karma: 529619
Join Date: May 2007
Device: iRex iLiad, DR800SG
Quote:
Originally Posted by Elfwreck View Post
Except the receiver is "making a copy" by downloading? And distributing to herself?
Only indirectly. There is no way a receiver can "make a copy". Downloaders never have access to the original. I can't make a copy of a file that sits on somebody else's computer. What happens is that my computer asks the uploader's computer for a copy, the uploader's computer then creates a copy and sends it to me. My computer never sees or "touches" the original file on their hard drive. I do not directly infringe on the distribution right, but I may be indirectly responsible for the infringement because I asked them for it.

Whether or not I'm indirectly responsible basically comes down to whether or not I was aware that when I asked for the file I was asking the uploader to commit copyright infringement on my behalf.

In the case of the Kindle books, I don't think you can argue that the customer's were inducing Amazon to commit the infringement. They likely had no idea that the eBook they purchased was unauthorized, so the responsibility was solely Amazon's (and the original uploader to Amazon).
Shaggy is offline   Reply With Quote