View Single Post
Old 07-09-2009, 04:14 PM   #169
Elfwreck
Grand Sorcerer
Elfwreck ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Elfwreck ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Elfwreck ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Elfwreck ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Elfwreck ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Elfwreck ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Elfwreck ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Elfwreck ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Elfwreck ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Elfwreck ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Elfwreck ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Elfwreck's Avatar
 
Posts: 5,187
Karma: 25133758
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: SF Bay Area, California, USA
Device: Pocketbook Touch HD3 (Past: Kobo Mini, PEZ, PRS-505, Clié)
Quote:
Originally Posted by kacir View Post
Yes. In quite a few jurisdictions.
If you make *distributing* illegal, then there will not be means to *acquire* unauthorized copy.
Sure there will. From people willing to break the law. Of which there seem to be plenty.

I'm rather fascinated with this concept... that whatever lawbreaking is done in distributing unauthorized copies, the receivers of those copies have no liability for damages, no responsibility to give them up. (If that's the case, certainly someone should file suit against Amazon, demanding the return of the purchased Rand books. I don't expect it'd succeed, but it should make several lawyers very twitchy.)

It's a fascinating legal situation--an action shared by two people, of which only one is liable for penalties. Very Discordian.

I suppose it's comparable to situations where prostitution is illegal but soliciting is not. Hmmm.
Elfwreck is offline   Reply With Quote