Thread: Seriousness Learning a new language
View Single Post
Old 07-01-2009, 02:59 PM   #122
Daithi
Publishers are evil!
Daithi ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Daithi ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Daithi ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Daithi ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Daithi ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Daithi ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Daithi ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Daithi ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Daithi ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Daithi ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Daithi ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Daithi's Avatar
 
Posts: 2,418
Karma: 36205264
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Rhode Island
Device: Various Kindles
Quote:
Originally Posted by nekokami View Post
In an alphabet, each symbol stands for one sound, either a vowel or a consonant. In a syllabary, each symbol stands for a whole syllable, usually a consonant-vowel pair. So, in Japanese, there is no separate letter for "M." There are 5 symbols, ma, mi, mu, me, mo. (in Hiragana, まみむめも。) Korean also uses a syllabary, Hangul, but the Korean syllabary was designed to be remarkably consistent and logical, based on phonetic sub-symbols known as Jamo.
Thanks Nekokami,

It sounds like a syllabary would be lot easier to read than words written with an alphabet. Does the Japanese syllabary cover the full range of sounds within Japanese words or is the syllabary just an approximation of how words sound? In other words are their sounds that aren't covered with these syllables?

Last edited by Daithi; 07-01-2009 at 03:06 PM. Reason: Edit: [It sounds like... no pun was intended :) ]
Daithi is offline   Reply With Quote