View Single Post
Old 06-27-2009, 04:03 AM   #187
HarryT
eBook Enthusiast
HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
HarryT's Avatar
 
Posts: 85,557
Karma: 93980341
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: UK
Device: Kindle Oasis 2, iPad Pro 10.5", iPhone 6
Quote:
Originally Posted by GlennD View Post
Would a patient in this hypothetical situation in the UK receive the care at the cost of $10K a day? It's not "life SAVING", but clearly a decision has to be made quickly or the care will be too late to even prolong life for that month.

I think in the US (and I may be wrong, but....) most health insurance would pay for this assuming we're talking about accepted, non-experimental treatments. An insurance company tends not to question the necessity case-by-case, they decide whether particular procedures are covered on a more general basis. An HMO on the other hand, would probably opt not to provide this type of expensive care with no hope of a life-saving outcome.
The NHS does provide life-extending drugs, yes, but as (I think Sparrow) mentioned earlier, there is a governing body called "NICE" (the "National Institute for Clinical Excellence") which decides which drugs the NHS should prescribe and which not. It's the ultra-expensive life-extending drugs which are always the contraversial ones.
HarryT is offline   Reply With Quote