View Single Post
Old 06-26-2009, 12:55 PM   #180
HarryT
eBook Enthusiast
HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
HarryT's Avatar
 
Posts: 85,557
Karma: 93980341
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: UK
Device: Kindle Oasis 2, iPad Pro 10.5", iPhone 6
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sparrow View Post
It may be worth mentioning NICE (National Institute for Clinical Health and Excellence) - they decide what treatments the NHS can offer.

I'm not sure if insurance systems like the ones in the US would offer a broader range of treatments; but NICE sometimes make controversial decisions that the NHS won't offer some treatments, because the benefits don't outweigh the costs.
http://www.pharmatimes.com/UKNews/article.aspx?id=16113

This may become more of an issue as the recession bites.
Any healthcare system has to do a "cost/benefit analysis" of treatments. If spending $10,000 a day would keep someone alive, but they would die anyway after a month, I suspect that not many insurance schemes would consider that an effective use of their clients' money. Treatments that merely "extend" life rather than provide a "cure" for a condition are especially hard to justify financially.
HarryT is offline   Reply With Quote