View Single Post
Old 06-24-2009, 01:27 PM   #159
HarryT
eBook Enthusiast
HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
HarryT's Avatar
 
Posts: 85,557
Karma: 93980341
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: UK
Device: Kindle Oasis 2, iPad Pro 10.5", iPhone 6
But attitudes have certainly changed since the 19th century due to the dramatic decline in the child mortality rate. In early 19th century England, roughly 1 in 4 children died before reaching the age of 5. That meant, not that parents loved their children less of course, but it was certainly not considered a "calamity" to lose a child (as is probably the prevelant attitude today), but merely a fact of life that one had to accept. That's why the death of children is such a recurrent theme in 19th century literature, both adult and children's books. Pretty much every child would have had brothers or sisters who had died.

Last edited by HarryT; 06-24-2009 at 01:30 PM.
HarryT is offline   Reply With Quote