While I have no problems when people argue/discuss about their preference of technologies used, I can't help but feel that it becomes apples-to-oranges comparison when it comes down to discussions b/w two specific devices.
In terms of functionalities, ergonomics, etc., I just find it annoying when, say, Kindle DX would be compared against a 9" netbook (a tablet one at that, especially in the near future w/ many upcoming tablet netbooks). For me, it seems as one would get them to fulfill different purposes - completing various tasks using a portable PC vs. reading a book on a dedicated reader, enjoying all the ergonomic benefits.
As for me, while I wish a tablet device that uses LCD would serve as an all-encompassing platform where I can do everything (for economic reasons & the high # of pdf documents), I just can't use LCD device for a prolonged time due to ergonomic & portability issues. Of course, this kind of preference must differ b/w each individual. Also, the nature of devices matter... for many, reading on LCD may be fine if they come in the forms of mobile phones and something like TechCrunch's upcoming CrunchPad (not that I like Mike Arrington).
Oh well, I'll sit & wait for Pixel Qi screens.
As for bias/group think issue and all, I think MobileRead is free of such things for the most part, including the whole supposed anti-LCD issue. I hear very good arguments from both sides (which means I'll never decide on that *perfect* device
). Compared to other places on the Internet, this place is very healthy in many aspects.
Of course, I'll have to disagree with doreenjoy & astra... in certain communities, you'll get slaughtered for voicing opposing opinions (e.g. speaking against libertarianism/atheism/marijuana legalization in the U.S. on social-bookmarking sites like Reddit, w/ younger audiences; being progressive on a place like... Rush Limbaugh forums; speaking against Zionist conspiracy theories on white supremacist forums; etc.). Yah, the Internet... er, bloody hell.