View Single Post
Old 06-22-2009, 12:36 PM   #58
Ham88
Zealot
Ham88 has learned how to read e-booksHam88 has learned how to read e-booksHam88 has learned how to read e-booksHam88 has learned how to read e-booksHam88 has learned how to read e-booksHam88 has learned how to read e-booksHam88 has learned how to read e-booksHam88 has learned how to read e-books
 
Ham88's Avatar
 
Posts: 134
Karma: 994
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Maine, United States
Device: Ectaco Jetbook
Quote:
Originally Posted by yvanleterrible View Post
Just as spent nuclear fuel is recyclable, so are batteries the impact of which is more manageable. Oh, and BTW spent nuclear fuel (not all is recyclable) is so expensive to reprocess that no one does it in America. They estimate it's cheaper to guard it for years and years.
Actually they stopped doing it the late seventies/ early eighties because the US felt that there was a risk that the amounts of plutonium (I believe) could be used by another country to produce nuclear weapons, something the US just can't stand for some reason I can't discern.
Ham88 is offline   Reply With Quote