View Single Post
Old 06-22-2009, 09:25 AM   #16
sirbruce
Provocateur
sirbruce ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.sirbruce ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.sirbruce ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.sirbruce ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.sirbruce ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.sirbruce ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.sirbruce ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.sirbruce ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.sirbruce ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.sirbruce ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.sirbruce ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
sirbruce's Avatar
 
Posts: 1,859
Karma: 505847
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Columbus, OH
Device: Kindle Touch, Kindle 2, Kindle DX, iPhone 3GS
Quote:
Originally Posted by HarryT View Post
EVERYBODY does characters better than Asimov. I would say that Asimov's characters were "two dimensional" if that wasn't an insult to two-dimensional objects . I love Asimov as an author, but "character" writing was not his strength.
"Action" wasn't his strong suit, either. A lot of people panned the movie I, Robot, but I remember thinking at the time after watching it, "Wow, who knew Asimov could write something so exciting!"
sirbruce is offline   Reply With Quote