View Single Post
Old 06-14-2009, 03:49 PM   #50
netseeker
sleepless reader
netseeker ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.netseeker ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.netseeker ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.netseeker ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.netseeker ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.netseeker ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.netseeker ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.netseeker ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.netseeker ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.netseeker ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.netseeker ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
netseeker's Avatar
 
Posts: 4,763
Karma: 615547
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Germany, near Stuttgart
Device: Sony PRS-505, PB 360° & 302, nook wi-fi, Kindle 3
Well, i use both: E-INK (Sony PRS-505) and LCD (Computer, Laptop, Netbook and iPod touch) and i prefer E-INK (I explained more than once in the forum why). But i would never say that LCD is generally useless and E-INK is perfect. First i had some prejudices against LCD but some friendly users here showed me that most of these prejudices were wrong. Now it's only my own experience that let's me prefer the one over the other.

I don't think that we have an an "anti-LCD/pro-Eink bias" here. Sometimes opinions are written just like facts and maybe E-INK supporters do this more often than LCD-supporters. So what? This is a discussion forum and not a playschool. If no one hyperventilates over a "anti-LCD/pro-Eink" or a "anti-Eink/pro-LCD" statement here and there then such statements aren't a big deal.

From time to time i would give a kingdom for either a LCD with the eye-friendly characteristics of an E-INK screen or an E-INK screen with the performance and robustness of a LCD...
netseeker is offline   Reply With Quote