Thread: Is there an anti-LCD/pro-Eink bias on MobileRead?
View Single Post
Old 06-14-2009, 02:57 PM   #49
Nate the great
Sir Penguin of Edinburgh
Nate the great ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Nate the great ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Nate the great ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Nate the great ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Nate the great ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Nate the great ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Nate the great ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Nate the great ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Nate the great ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Nate the great ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Nate the great ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Nate the great's Avatar
 
Posts: 12,375
Karma: 23555235
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: DC Metro area
Device: Shake a stick plus 1
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sweetpea View Post
My idea? The LCD supporters are safe in the knowledge that they have a good technology. No reason to defend it. While the e-ink supporters may harbour doubts about it and feel the need to defend it.

(why are some people jealous when their partner talks to somebody of the opposite sex, while others aren't? It might be the same problem...)

And I can post those things at every e-ink based device (and you forgot the most import one: no touch-screen!)

And Harry, I sometimes get the feeling I'm a second-grade e-reader person, because I don't own an e-ink device. And from the responses from other people I think some others may feel the same. There are people that say LCD = bad, e-ink = good and nothing in between.
I'd rather you didn't. I think we should leave those kinds of comments to tech blogs like Gizmodo and Engadget.
Nate the great is offline   Reply With Quote