View Single Post
Old 11-23-2006, 01:58 PM   #29
HarryT
eBook Enthusiast
HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
HarryT's Avatar
 
Posts: 85,557
Karma: 93980341
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: UK
Device: Kindle Oasis 2, iPad Pro 10.5", iPhone 6
Quote:
Originally Posted by yvanleterrible
Broadcasting power would surely not be permitted by the FCC.
You can't practically broadcast power - you're killed by the inverse square law - you need to transmit massive amounts of power for even a tiny amount to be picked up by a receiver.

The point of this MIT idea is that the power isn't being "broadcast", but instead directly transferred from the transmitter to the receiver (which are linked by "resonance coupling") via some kind of "quantum tunnelling" effect. Their claim is that it should work over a range of several metres, and be highly efficient.

It would be great if it ever came to fruition as a practical concept. They're just talking theory at present.
HarryT is offline   Reply With Quote