Quote:
Originally Posted by ahi
This translation dates 1910 and in its original publication is heavily annotated... which may explain the use of numbers. So you might well be right in your suggestions.
Due to a desire to remain faithful to the (acknowledgedly imperfect) original (1910 edition) I am unlikely to make editorial changes per se... but upon reflection, the numbers might not be a terrible idea to remove in an unannotated edition.
Thanks, Nate!
- Ahi
|
Now the numbering makes sense. Since each refers to a specific annotation I think you should move them to the end of the related sentences(1).