Hmmm...how about reading the actual manuscript? Here it is:
http://www.law.cam.ac.uk/faculty-res...ssessment/6286
Or you could read the abstract and recommendations here:
http://www.ip-watch.org/weblog/2009/...al-assessment/
I think the conclusions are worth reading. It much less sensationalises Ars Technica's own title and really gets to actual problems rather than using loosey-goosey phrase such as "makes pirates out of all of us". The conclusions are much more nuanced and meaningful than that.
A key conclusion is that DRM can prevent permissible acts from being executed in the U.K: "Although DRM has not impacted on many acts permitted by law,
certain permitted acts are being adversely affected by the use of DRM [emphasis mine]."